Today I’ve got this Issue on my Nationstates (nationstates.net)
Appointment Of A Science Advisor
After the government’s chief science advisor accidentally disintegrated himself in his latest experiment, you have come under pressure to appoint someone new to the position – but the leading candidates to replace him all have different priorities.
I’ve encountered with many choices
1. “Science is critical to understanding our place in the natural world,” writes biologist Don Colbert in his application letter, which is covered in paw-prints and smells faintly of ANIMAL dung. “I believe we need to look more closely at how our actions affect the environment, and if I’m appointed as advisor, I’ll make sure the government takes the long term view to ecological preservation – even if that does mean putting a few public works projects and industry partnerships on hold.”
2. “Now now, you’re not going to listen to all that tree-hugging nonsense, are you?” cajoles chemist Dave Columbus, introduced to you at a cocktail party thrown by one of your biggest corporate donors. “The government needs to be partnering up with industry, not making things harder for them. If I’m appointed, I’ll make sure the government promotes innovation and invention – and if that means loosening up some of those silly environmental laws, then so be it!”
3. “Typical: a new vacancy for a government science advisor opens up, and it immediately becomes a boys’ club,” sighs physicist Tanya Wayne, sporting a rather fetching pink lab coat. “Do you realize that girls outperform boys in science at every grade in school, but that far fewer women end up taking jobs in the sciences than men? Appointing a woman as the nation’s science advisor would be a great first step to improving access to the sciences for everyone – and I’d use the position to lobby for universities and research centres to hire more women, too.”
4. “Whomever you appoint will just end up leading NATIONSNAME into further damnation!” rants fundamentalist preacher Lara Suzuki in one of her sermons, replete with typically alarming – and anatomically explicit – descriptions of what this damnation will actually entail. “It’s time we purged the government of all its heathen influences, and that includes removing anyone who might go around using words like evolution, or entropy, or evidence!” She breaks off to chase after a group of scientists passing by, waving a pitchfork at them.
————————————————
Option 1. sounds nice so I choose it.
The result saids ‘Every new building project has to undergo a five-year environmental impact study before it can go ahead.’
In result, my nation get a boost of this qualities.
Environmental Beauty
Pounds Of Wildlife Per Square Mile 2.5%
Weather
Meters Of Sunlight 2.5%
Eco-Friendliness
Dolphin Recycling Awareness Index 1.9%
Tourism
Tourists Per Hour 0.92%
Public Education
Edu-tellignce® Test Score 0.86%
Average Income
0.58%
Economic Output
0.58%
Intelligence
Quips Per Hour 0.47%
Lifespan
Years 0.26%
Scientific Advancement
Kurzweil Singularity Index 0.22%
Human Development Index
Human Development Index 0.14%
Pacifism
Cheeks Turned Per Day 0.13%
Government Size
Bureaucratic Comprehensiveness Rating Scale Index 0.1%
And decline in this qualities
Employment
Workforce Participation Rate 0.15%
Obesity
Obesity Rate 0.30%
Crime
Crimes Per Hour 0.50%
Public Transport
Societal Mobility Rating 0.57%
Welfare
Safety Net Mesh Density Rating 0.57%
Public Healthcare
Theresa-Nightingale Rating 0.57%
Foreign Aid
Clooney Contribution Index 0.57%
Charmlessness
Kardashian Reflex Score 1.8%
Business Subsidization
Gilded Widget Scale 2.4%
Industry: Mining
Blue Sky Asbestos Index 4.9%
Industry: Timber Woodchipping
Tasmanian Pulp Environmental Export Index 8.2%
Sector: Agriculture
Mu-Bah-Daggs Productivity Index 12.2%
Industry: Trout Fishing
Nemo Depletion Efficiency Index 30.8%
This choice is nice.
What’s up mates, its wonderful paragraph about educationand
fully defined, keep it up all the time.