Today I’ve got this Issue on my Nationstates (nationstates.net)
Welfare Programs Not Faring Well
A recent lull in legislation has sparked the fires of some bored politicians. After reviewing the back-log of constituent complaints, they’ve come to your desk demanding welfare reform.
I’ve encountered with 5 choices
1. “The process ought to be made easier,” says Inga Matthews, picking the grime out of her dirty fingernails. “It’s so difficult convincing welfare administrators that I am actually a poor, helpless vagrant on the brink of homelessness! When you finally do, you get tangled up in all the red tape, and you’re lucky to see a dime. The government should just trust my word and fork over the CURRENCY I need to survive.”
2. “The current system is not very efficient, I’ll admit,” says Alexei Anderson, a local welfare administrator and esteemed bureaucrat. “But we can’t trust these bums to manage their welfare aid. How are we supposed to help them help themselves if they waste their benefits on things like trashy clothes and cheap alcohol? We need more authority over how the aid is spent, it’s the only way we can be assured that it is used responsibly.”
3. “Get the free-loaders off the government teat!” shouts conservative activist, Chloe Hamilton. “The free-market system says that those who work hard will succeed. If these so-called ‘needy people’ would roll their sleeves up, lift a finger, and earn an honest living, we wouldn’t be bankrupting our country helping them! The only sensible solution is to abolish all welfare programs, and let the natural, capitalist process take place.”
4. “He has a point,” says popular political pundit Harry Bronte. “There are a lot of people in the system, and some of them don’t really need to be there. The government should be finding these people jobs, so that our welfare system can survive and meet the needs of the truly impoverished. Of course, we’re going to have to spend a few CURRENCY to achieve this goal. But, what’s a little tax hike if it means saving our dying welfare programs and the people who depend on them?”
5. “Capitalism is the very reason why we need welfare in the first place. Laissez-faire policies would only make the problem worse,” argues political activist Thomas Laine. “If the government would ensure that all employers pay their employees the amount they need to live – no more, no less – then the problem of providing for the poor would disappear.”
6. Dismiss the issue
————————————————
Option 4 may boost Workforce right so I choose it.
The result saids ‘The government is using tax revenues to provide jobs for the poor.‘
In result, my nation get a boost of this qualities.
Industry: Pizza Delivery
Authoritarianism
Welfare
Income Equality
Ideological Radicality
Pacifism
Government Size
Taxation
Tourism
And decline in this qualities
Obesity
Lifespan
Crime
Employment
Human Development Index
Average Income
Economic Output
Public Healthcare
Eco-Friendliness
Public Education
Public Transport
Foreign Aid
Business Subsidization
Sector: Manufacturing
Economy
Wealth Gaps
Weaponization
Economic Freedom
The result is ironic since some industry grow but lesser in employment.
The welfare program was designed to be temporary. Free education is offered and wasted. The American taxpayer has more taken from his hard earned wages continually,with low turnout. Look at waterbury ct. To see the percentage of welfare cases. In some states there are notices to go to waterbury to live. I would like free education. This system needs to end. Period!!!
I do agree with all the ideas you’ve offered on your post.
They’re really convincing and can definitely work.
Still, the posts are too brief for newbies. May you please lengthen them a little from next
time? Thanks for the post.